Mainstream Media, Climaticide, and Extreme Weather: Reporting Out of Context
Sat Jun 21, 2008 at 06:40:05 PM PDT
Maybe the Mainstream Media is finally getting the message. As I reported on Thursday, NBC actually aired a piece on the their Nightly News about a new report from U.S. Climate Change Science Program linking Climaticide to extreme weather events.
Then, yesterday, syndicated columnist, Amy Goodman, had a piece in the Seattle Post Intelligencer called Flooding is global warming at work in which she took the Mainstream Media to task for their failure to connect the dots in their reporting on extreme weather events and Climaticide. Double score here. Goodman reports on the link between Climaticide and extreme weather and criticizes the MSM for acting as if the connection does not exist.
It's the Planet Stupid!
Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 12:01:44 PM PDT
(Cross-posted at Checklist Toward Zero Carbon.)
Iraq, health care, the economy - all important issues.
And all are a diversion from the one true crisis we face. For if we don't solve the global warming crisis all other important issues will cease to be, period.
An article by Joseph Romm, "Obama and Clinton plan to cool it" takes a look at Hillary and Barack and climate change.
Mr. Romm starts strong with a clear-eyed description of what's at stake:
The gravest threat to the American way of life is posed by unrestricted greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Global warming threatens to put the Southwest into a permanent drought, raise sea levels by 6 or more inches a decade, generate hundreds of millions of environmental refugees at home and abroad, wipe out half the planet's species, and increase average temperatures in the nation's interior 10-20 degrees Fahrenheit. And these impacts would likely get steadily worse for hundreds of years or longer.
Even the global warming accepters are in denial
Sun Mar 02, 2008 at 11:03:10 AM PDT
This diary was suggested by two recent pieces on abrupt climate change: Joseph Romm's piece on Salon.com (The cold truth about climate change), and a paper in the journal Risk Analysis which was seized upon by columnist John Tierney in a column for the New York Times: "Global Warming Paradox"? I discuss these articles in order to suggest that there is a general state of denial as regards the social and economic causes of abrupt climate change, thus to suggest that therein lies the discovery of social and economic solutions.
(crossposted at Docudharma)